New Year Resolutions

It seems a good time to be making new year resolutions - let's see how many actually lasts the whole year! These are do-able, not too strenuous on time commitments... so here goes.

1.Print and Frame up 10 photos.

I cheat. I got 2 photos framed up by someone else (above is one of em), although the framing was very cheap - hanging up in my office in front of me - is quite nice! Photos were meant to be printed and enjoyed, and not just as a desktop wallpaper. IMHO. So I think there is space for 8 more. There's always wall space at home to be invaded too!



 

2.Intentionally shoot

Go out and shoot something intentionally once a month. More than just family shots, events or church pictures. I will (try) and make time (Saturday morning or an evening) to go out and shoot something.

 






3.Learn something on Photoshop.

I'm a complete newbie on Photoshop. Ok, I did learn how to post-process star trails,  But if I am to develop (*get it?*) I need to keep expanding all parts of my photography journey, and the weakest (well, amongst many other parts) link is my post-processing. I did buy a book last year, which I never quite got started - so I'm calling it - learn something (could be an simple action, but something I didn't know before) once every quarter! That should get me to chapter 4 by end of the year.

 
4. Attend a photography tour/workshop.

Ideally, twice, but let's start with just 1. I did a Bromo shoot last year, which was really really fantastic - in getting me out of my photography doldrums. It's great to meet other photographers and learn something practical.

 





5.Travel and shoot

I also tremendously enjoyed shooting in Bhutan (in my getaway with the wifey) last year. Nothing like a new place, culture to pique interest. Love it!

 









6.Shoot something different.

Last year, I learned shooting stars, dabbled in a bit of Infrared photography, and using fisheye.
I need to keep on trying the IR, learn to see architecture through the fisheye. Maybe I will try Macro photography (not bugs though, maybe seeing common everyday things in a different light) - which means I HAVE to buy a new lens... (hehe).


Do you have any resolutions that hasn't been already broken since 1 Jan?
Happy Shooting everyone!

Anatomy of a Shot

I was just in Singapore for a meeting, and as always, I bring my tripod and camera with me, because I find that there is always something interesting to photograph (grass is greener on the other side?)
Anyway, I was a little short on time, and didn't get to shoot anything, but when I got to the airport about to come back - I told myself that I HAD to shoot something, so that I didn't feel like I wasted the effort of lugging my camera stuff for nothing.

As usual, I'm drawn to the stark architecture of T3. 2 of the lift had the top covered by advertisements (urgh!), but managed to find one "naked", where I camped for 45min after checking in, and before having to board.

And just because it's been ages since I blogged, I thought I take a walk through the process of this shot, from beginning right up to the post processing.

First thing is to pick the scene, work on the composition of the frame. I wanted this lift to be the main focus of the shot, I liked the bare, industrial look of it, which fits in with the roofing, and the lines on the floor kinda lead to it. I took maybe 20-30 shots, trying out without filters, and with filters, various exposure times.

In the end, I selected this - coz I thought pictures without people looked too sterile and cold. The slow shutter speed gave a sense of movement - and the guy walking across, without blocking the lift was what I liked. A trick is that since I was camped there, all set up with a tripod and remote trigger, people will ignore you - if you pretend to look elsewhere. :)
 
Anyway, this is the RAW file.

 Due to the nature of the lens (wide angle), you will see that the picture is "bent". But Lightroom has now evolved so that it auto-corrects the distortion. One click later and you get

Pretty neat huh! All the bent lines (and pillars) all straighten out.

Next, I strip out the colors, cause it adds nothing to it. I just love black and whites.

Now, the problem is, because the window scene is very bright, the rest of the picture (indoor) is a bit dark. The lift is lost in the business of the picture - so my global (affects the whole picture) adjustments in Lightroom is to lower the highlights, increase the shadows, and boost clarity.

I still didn't think that the lift stood out clearly enough, so I "darkened" the bright window more, darkened the lift, boosted overall exposure to accentuate the dark lift against the white background. I actually spent a bit of time fine-tuning this via the black and white sliders - to give the final image right on top.

The lessons are:
1. Start with an image you are happy with in terms of composition - this takes time and effort to experiment with various settings/filters. 

2. Post processing is an important part of getting to how you envisage the final image to be. You will see that the final image is starkly different to the RAW. And whilst I don't really use photoshop, I am a big proponent of Lightroom - it is a important and very powerful tool - that is (almost) as important as the gear you use.

Happy Shooting!

Anatomy of a Super Long Exposure Shot.

Holidays are the best times to explore and photograph new places.
Here's a shot of Rainbow Beach, just a stone's throw where we holidayed (in Gold Coast) just.

This is the EXIF: 16mm (as wide as you can go); ISO100 (native ISO, for the cleanest pictures); F16 (I always start with F16 in landscape shots); 446s (yes, that is more than 7 minutes).

Here's how its done.

Firstly, the key is composition. Take your time, look around, and find a composition that you like.
So I liked the dramatic clouds, foreground interests (big boulders). I decided not to go rule of thirds, and just shot the horizon at the middle, because I wasn't sure which I liked more - sky or boulders. In long exposures, the clouds are important, they are the paint brushes for the shot. But the foreground interest is the stability in the picture, that adds great contrasts. So I kept both.

Side note, shooting with the tripod in the sea - is difficult. I tried quite a few, but coz of waves, it ends up not tack sharp/blur. So I had to navigate through the boulders to find a spot for my tripod - stable enough, away from waves, and a decent composition.

Take your time.

So this is the first shot, without the ND filter. F16; 16mm; ISO100; 0.8s.
I love the ND filter, ever since I solved my light leakage problem, I was confident again in using this. A recap - this filter takes out 499/500 of the light hitting the camera sensor.
So if the shot above is 0.8s, with the filter, it should be 0.8 times 500 = 400 (or 6 min 40s). As the sun was setting, light was dropping - I let it go open for a bit more.

This is what I got.

I got this strange purple hue at the bottom right (the picture is already slightly corrected, but couldn't get rid of this) - so what I did was to convert it to Black and White - and you get the picture right on top.

So the ND filter smoothens out the water, giving you that milky tranquil feel. The clouds become your paint brush. It really is a trial and error process, you never really know what you are going to get. But if you don't try it, you won't know.
Also, with a 7 minute shot, you don't get many chances at this.

There you go. Keep shooting!

How a Hat solved my photography achilles heel

Since my trip to Australia in March last year, I've noticed that this line/purple hue appears whenever I use my Hoya ND400 filter (its a 9 stop filter which allows 1/500 of light through - to allow you to shoot long exposures) - see example above. Initially, it only appeared occasionally. Eventually, the filter fell apart, and I replaced it. I also upgraded my wide angle lens from Tokina 11-16 (DX lens) to Nikon 16-35 (Full Frame) lens. The frequency of the purple banding/line - became almost 100% - and asking my photography friends in Indonesia, in Singapore - no one had ever seen it. I didn't think it was the filter (since it was new, and also happened with the old filter), the lens or camera (since it doesn't appear when I don't use the filter).

This recent trip to Lombok, it appeared again! And I was determined to eliminate as many variables as possible, before I ditched the filter and adopt a new system.

So here's the normal 16mm shot, without filter.

The shot with the filter is right on top. Argh!
So, I tried it with a different lens - the 24-70mm. And this is the result:

ok, no problem right? Here's the same shot, with the ND filter.

Argh! So it definitely isn't a lens problem. Maybe a filter problem? I try the same shot, but this time, the filter is turned 90 degrees... to see if the line changes.

?!!! erm, three's no difference! I'm stumped. It isn't a problem with the filter, not the lens. I try searching on the internet again, and finally stumble on the problem - light leakage from the view finder! Its when you have light going through the view finder, leaking into the sensor. Its more pronounced during long exposures.

And so, since I didn't bring the view finder blocker (which I've never used) - I used my good old trust-worthy hat- and just hung it over the view-finder...

Voila! It works! Trying about 10 more different shots, the line is gone! Hurray!
Light leakage - it seems to be more camera specific, and happens with the D600 (didn't happen with my D90). So if it happens, use your hat!

Exploring Lightroom 5's Perspective Correction

An interesting picture of one of Jakarta's main streets - Jl. Jend. Sudirman at right at peak hour. So I used a 10 stop Neutral Density filter, so the busy cars zipped by (slowly), leaving only bare trace of light trails.

And as I used a 16mm lens, you'll see the lens distortion - buildings aren't upright. And you'll need photoshop to correct it.

However, since the release of Lightroom 5, a new feature is the perspective correction - which I tried. So the "Auto" turns out like this:

Not too bad - the buildings are more or less upright, but maybe a little to much as the top looks bigger than the bottom.

There is a "Full" perspective correction, which makes the picture like this:

So.... not always turns out well.

Summary: It's a useful little feature, which is a one click adjustment. Works out some of the time - whether "Full" or "Auto", try and experiment to see which turns out better, or which you like better.
Is it worth an upgrade to LR5, if you have say LR 4? Prob not. But if you have it, use it.

Keep Shooting!
Soo Sing

Sports Photography Tips - 1 year the wiser?

I believe I can fly. F2.8; 1/500; ISO2200.

Here's a follow up, one and a half years after writing this.

I still love going to my kids' sports events - both to see them grow in the sports they love, as well as for me to use the hobby I love to some good use!

1.Equipment

I armed myself with my standard lens 24-70 f2.8 and my "sports" lens 80-200 f2.8; and of course shot with my beloved D600.

With basketball, at least in the arena I was shooting, it was small, and I was able to get up close, so I shot manly with the 24-70. A thing to note is that, because basketball is a very quick game,having a zoom is very useful - if not essential - to getting the shot. Especially if you are like me, with only 1 body to use.

Shooting indoors can be tricky. Hard to hit 1/500 if there isn't enough light. So having a f2.8 (or faster?) lens is helpful. But it is more expensive. The key is really to use whatever lenses you have.






2.Shooting Mode
To freeze the action, you'll need to shoot at at least 1/500 or  faster. So I use aperture mode (biggest aperture possible at F2.8); allow a highest ISO (better noisy sharp picture, than clean blur one) plus a minimum shutter speed at 1/500.

I also used with Auto-Focus (Continuous) or AI-Servo in Canon speak, so that the camera continues to track the subject, and changes the focus accordingly. Not 100%, but its pretty good - maybe 80% it is able to track the subject. The problem with the D600 is the small focus area this has. But we work with the "limitations" we have.

Instead of the normal single shot I take, I take multiple - which will give me a better chance of catching the "moment".

3.Know the sport and Anticipate
To shoot sports, you need to know about the sport (fortunately, knowing how to play it is completely optional). You'll need to know how fast the game is, where your subject (my son) will be; what position he plays, what kind of plays he likes to make - where the action will be.

My son is a scorer (shooting guard I think), always attacking the basket. So I plonked myself just under the basket at where I know he'll be shooting.

In the picture above, my son stole the ball from the opponent, dribbled quickly towards the basket - I knew that he'd either lay-up or try a short jumper - so I'm tracking him with my camera, and shooting - until he takes the shot, then you get your shot. 

4.Capture the moment
I love this picture because it captures that moment - the moment when he just release the shot; and since its a steal, everyone is chasing him, and nicely facing the camera.

I converted the picture to black and white - because color would just be too fussy, distracting. With black and white, you focus on shadows and shapes - and in this case, my son is enveloped by the indoor lights; and the shadows of the players chasing him cast on the court.



There are no short cuts to any form of photography. No amount of reading books/forums/internet can replicate just going out there to shoot, and learning from experience. It's also not about the equipment. Just keep shooting!

Rookie Mistake! Sigh.

I almost always shoot in Aperture Mode. Sometimes Manual for landscapes.

There was a dance at church earlier that day, and decided that with the low light, I wanted to capture the movement "frozen" - and so switched to Shutter Priority - setting 1/500s, and letting the camera pick ISO and Aperture size.

And of course, I forgot to switch it back (you know where this is heading....).
So when I had a hot date with my wife at night, I had to shoot what I eat (wife groans...) and shot this appetizer (warm brie with grilled vegetables - which was quite nice). I noticed on the screen it looking a little dark, but didn't think too much, shot a few, then ate.

Then when I processed the picture - I noticed that this was shot at aperture f2.8 (which is right); ISO 25,600 (erh....); and shutter speed 1/500s! Doh! Forgot to switch back, forgot to check - rookie mistake!

Oh well, lesson learned. Always double check your settings, before you shoot.
And yes, keep shooting!